5 Axioms | Paul Watzlawick |Pragmatic human  communication

Pragmatic human communication

forms the basis of what we call pragmatic human communication and lays the foundation for context-based approaches to psychotherapy. We communicate with a man who cannot communicate, and we communicate in the context of his behavior, which in itself is a form of communication. ^{Sources: 0}

Paul Watzlawick first set out his axioms of communication 

in the pragmatics of human communication. The five communication axioms formulated by him and his colleagues help to describe the communication process. ^{Sources: 0, 1}

Watzlawicks axioms convey an understanding of the understanding and competence that effective negotiators and mediators display as interpersonal communicators. Viewing the theory in the context of conflict resolution provides negotiators or mediators with sharp insights into the source of communication problems. The Five Axiom describes interpersonal communication based on two key aspects: the communication process and the relationship between the communicator and his partner. ^{Sources: 1}

This relationship is an Axiom of human communication,

but there is no evidence that communication has any behavior outside of this relationship. In order to avoid confusion about the relationship axioms and their meaning, we want to clarify that they are rarely defined. ^{Sources: 0}

It may not be the first statement we communicate, but it can be communicated by explaining or illustrating what it is. ^{Sources: 0, 7}

The first Axiom

shows that everything one does is a message, and every activity, inactivity, word, or silence has a news value. People communicate as soon as they perceive each other; others cannot react to communication and are thus themselves. Nonverbal communication gives us our true feelings and intentions, so that we can explain our behavior in dealing with customers, providers, work colleagues, whether we consciously or unconsciously decide to avoid contact or interact with them. We communicate with others, but we cannot communicate ourselves, we communicate with others. 

The content of a relationship can be explained by explaining that any kind of communication contains an aspect of the content of that relationship, because the relationship is determined by the content. 

The fourth Axiom

describes communication based on punctuation, partners, and communication methods. The axioms describe communication that depends on cause and effect, which means that communication is based on the relationship between a partner and his partner and not on the content of the communication process. 

This part helps to create continuity and extend the scope of exchanges that take place during communication, as well as the relationship between the two parties. 

The fourth axiom of Paul Watzlawick is that there is no one-to-one communication between two people, but rather a series of exchanges. Take it from a teacher who practically made you memorize these five axioms of communication. 

It was here that I first came across Watzlawicks axioms of human communication in a book by a colleague concerned with pragmatic human communication. Jackson wrote from the perspective of psychology, particularly about family systems. It discusses how communication works in families and similar systems and is therefore a great source of information on the nature of communication and its relationship to human relationships. 

The axioms that are a great resource for those interested in the work that examines the nature of human communication and its relationship to human relations and relationships in general. 

Watzlawicks axioms on human communication encompass a number of the most important ones in human relations and relationships. The book “Pragmatic Human Communication,” published in 1967, is a groundbreaking statement for those interested in behavioral and psychiatric problems related to their relationship to human relationships and communication. 

Watzlawick defines five basic axioms of communication theory, popularly known as the interactional view. These five axioms are necessary to have a functioning communication process, and there is no better example of this than the interaction between a person and his partner. 

As far as theory is concerned, misunderstandings can arise if the communicators do not speak the same language. These 5 axioms help explain how a misunderstanding can occur and describe the process of communication that takes place during human interaction. All one does is the message and the other responds to it, but not exactly as he does. 

Be aware of this and pay attention to what you say and what you do not say, and wish you had said it because it sums up the central problem of communication quite well.

Paul Watzlawick deserves some credit for this, but this axiom applies to any communication situation, as most of his work is devoted to behavior, the way we communicate with our families. 

Playlist Y-Tube Paul Watzlawick

1° Axiome | You Not Cannot Communicate | Paul Watzlawick

2° Axiome | Content and Form | Paul Watzlawick

3° Axiome | PUNCTUATION | Paul Watzlawick

4° Axiome | Digital & Analogic | Paul Watzlawick

5° Axiome | Symmetric and Complementary | Paul Watzlawick